Archive for June, 2012


How We Know What We Know — rushes to judgment

If you are following the comments, you will see one writer who accuses me of being dishonest. There are many more out there who think the same thing. They rush to judgment because they miss the point of this series of blogs. One accuses me of being dishonest because the evolutionist websites he checks says [...]

How We Know What We Know — ages of rocks and dishonest measuring

Let’s continue the story from the last blog. Scientists have a real problem when it comes to dating old things – our methods are very unreliable and give a wide range of dates (as seen last time). That means that artifacts are dated by theory rather than by hard science. Science has every right to [...]

How We Know What We Know, pt.4 — Handling Evidence Honestly…or not

Since our thought processes are dependent upon limited, physical  inputs and internal handling  (i.e. our senses and how our brain/mind sort them to make sense of reality), we know that we will have to rely on faith for a great deal of our daily activities. I place faith in drivers that they will behave, stay [...]

How Do We Know What We Know? pt. 3

Something is. And that’s a problem. The very existence of matter or mind causes everyone problems. How do we explain what we experience through our senses and process through our brains? And how can we know our conclusions are reliable? A strange but important experiment that has been conducted quite a few times might help [...]